Review of Introduction to Lattices and Order ( B . a . Davey

نویسنده

  • H. A. PRIESTLEY
چکیده

The idea that a set may come equipped with a natural ordering on its elements is so basic as to pass by unnoticed by most. However, this belies a wonderful opportunity for unifying the study of many disparate examples of these creatures. Historically, the study of order has led to a great unification of results in algebra and logic. More recently, it has infused into theoretical computer science, particularly into programming language semantics. Given two elements, x and y, in some partially ordered set, or poset, P , it is often the case that they have both a least upper bound, lub{x, y}, and a greatest lower bound, glb{x, y}. An example of such a poset is provided by the natural numbers under their usual order. However, this property certainly does not hold for every poset. For instance, suppose that the underlying set of P consists of those finite subsets of N that have even cardinality. This becomes a poset by saying that x is less than or equal to y just in case x is a subset of y. Now, suppose that x = {1, 2} and y = {2, 3}. Any upper bound of both x and y has to contain x∪y = {1, 2, 3}. Necessarily, a least upper bound would have cardinality 4. However, there is no least such set containing {1, 2, 3}. If we are in the happy situation that any two elements of our poset P have both a least upper bound and a greatest lower bound, then we say that P is a lattice. If P is a lattice and x, y ∈ P , then let us save on effort by writing glb{x, y} as x ∨ y and lub{x, y} as x ∧ y. The operator ∨ is called join and the operator ∧ is called meet. Playing around with these operators a bit, one may notice some identities starting to crop up. Amongst those identities that hold for elements a, b, c ∈ P , we find the following: a ∧ a = a a ∨ a = a a ∧ b = b ∧ a a ∨ b = b ∨ a a ∧ (b ∧ c) = (a ∧ b) ∧ c a ∨ (b ∨ c) = (a ∨ b) ∨ c a ∧ (a ∨ b) = a a ∨ (a ∧ b) = a In fact, the above equations are sufficient to define P by making the observation that a ≤ b if and only if a = a ∧ b. So, we have two ways of looking at a lattice. That is, we can see it as either a special sort of poset or as a set with two binary operators satisfying the above equalities. This brings us to the book under review, which sets out to provide a thorough introduction to both points of view. Examples of lattices abound in theoretical computer science and, indeed, the book makes no bones about dipping into computational applications on a regular basis. Let’s see what’s between the covers, shall we?

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Regularity in residuated lattices

In this paper, we study residuated lattices in order to give new characterizations for dense, regular and Boolean elements in residuated lattices and investigate special residuated lattices in order to obtain new characterizations for the directly indecomposable subvariety of Stonean residuated lattices. Free algebra in varieties of Stonean residuated lattices is constructed. We introduce in re...

متن کامل

Order Almost Dunford-Pettis Operators on Banach Lattices

By introducing the concepts of order almost Dunford-Pettis and almost weakly limited operators in Banach lattices, we give some properties of them related to some well known classes of operators, such as, order weakly compact, order Dunford-Pettis, weak and almost Dunford- Pettis and weakly limited operators. Then, we characterize Banach lat- tices E and F on which each operator from E into F t...

متن کامل

Stone Spaces versus Priestley Spaces

[1] B. Banaschewski, Über nulldimensionale Räume, Math. Nache 13 (1955) 129-140. [2] F. Borceux and J. Janelidze, Galois Theories, Cambridge University Press (2001). [3] M. Dias and M. Sobral, Descent for Priestley Spaces, Appl. Categor. Struct 14 (2006) 229-241. [4] B. A. Davey and H. A. Priestley, Introduction to Lattices and Order, Cambridge Mathematical Texbooks (1990). [5] R. Engelking and...

متن کامل

Boolean Topological Distributive Lattices and Canonical Extensions

This paper presents a unified account of a number of dual category equivalences of relevance to the theory of canonical extensions of distributive lattices. Each of the categories involved is generated by an object having a 2-element underlying set; additional structure may be algebraic (lattice or complete lattice operations) or relational (order) and, in either case, topology may or may not b...

متن کامل

DIRECTLY INDECOMPOSABLE RESIDUATED LATTICES

The aim of this paper is to extend results established by H. Onoand T. Kowalski regarding directly indecomposable commutative residuatedlattices to the non-commutative case. The main theorem states that a residuatedlattice A is directly indecomposable if and only if its Boolean center B(A)is {0, 1}. We also prove that any linearly ordered residuated lattice and anylocal residuated lattice are d...

متن کامل

Some properties of b-weakly compact operators on Banach lattices

In this paper we give some necessary and sufficient conditions for which each Banach lattice  is    space and we study some properties of b-weakly compact operators from a Banach lattice  into a Banach space . We show that every weakly compact operator from a Banach lattice  into a Banach space  is b-weakly compact and give a counterexample which shows that the inverse is not true but we prove ...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2005